First step | The researcher, acting as the facilitator, welcomes the group and explains the method being used |
Second step | The researcher describes a specific personal situation, in which they faced an ethical dilemma |
Third step | Involves formulating the ethical question, so that the researcher presents the ethical question and relevant dilemma |
Fourth step | Participants are asked to put themselves in the position of the individual facing the ethical dilemma in order to gain better understanding of the situation |
Fifth step | The participants examine the values ​​and norms of the involved people to grasp the complexity of the issue and collaboratively plot a chart of perspectives, values and norms |
Sixth step | Alternative solutions to the ethical dilemma are proposed |
Seventh step | All available options are listed, and the participants are asked to specify which option they would choose and why, explaining the values and norms influencing their choice |
Eighth step | Similarities and differences between individual considerations are considered |
Ninth step | Conclusions are drawn, and an action plan is proposed |
Tenth step | Involves evaluation, based on which in the subsequent consultation session, before presenting a new ethical dilemma, the researcher asks participants about any new experience similar to the ethical dilemma proposed in the previous session |