Skip to main content

Table 3 History and development of lung allocation

From: Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States

Name

Contributing Author(s)

Year of Publication

Year of Adoption by UNOS

Objective

Included Criteria

Changes to Criteria

Range of Scores

Calculation

N/A

N/A

Unknown

Unknown

Balance postoperative survival and risk of death without transplant

Time accrued on the waitlist

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

UNOS

N/A

1995

Balance postoperative survival and risk of death without transplant

Time accrued on the waitlist, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) status

+ IPF status

90 days were added to patients on the waitlist who had IPF

N/A

Lung Allocation Score

UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation

Committee Lung Allocation

Subcommittee

Unknown

2005

Balance postoperative survival and risk of death without transplant

Age, assisted ventilation requirement, serum, bilirubin and creatinine, body mass index, cardiac index before exercise, central venous pressure, mechanical ventilation status, diabetes status, diagnosis, forced vital capacity, functional status, oxygen requirement at rest, pulmonary artery pressure, 6-min walk test distance

*All variables are added compared to the previous model. Variables in the previous model no longer exist in this version

The waitlist and post-transplant area under the curve are mapped. Transplant benefit is calculated as the difference between post-transplant and waitlist survival. The normalized LAS score ranges from 0 to 100.

Raw LAS = posttransplant survival − 2 x (waitlist urgency measure).

Normalized LAS = 100 x [raw LAS x (2 × 365)]/(3 × 365).

Composite Allocation Score

OPTN ad hoc Committee on Geography

2019

2023

Balance postoperative survival and risk of death without transplant

Waitlist survival (5-year WLAUC), post-transplant survival (5-year PTAUC), biological disadvantages (blood type, CPRA, height), patient access (prior living donation, pediatric status), placement efficiency (travel cost and proximity)

+ length of WTAUC and PTAUC assessments (1 year vs. 5 years)

+ prior living donation status

+ pediatric status

From 0 to 100

CAS = 0.25 x waitlist survival + 0.25 x post-transplant survival + 0.15 x biological disadvantages + 0.25 x patient access + 0.1 x placement efficiency